How can you not enjoy a tale of two worlds in which the parents battle with the children over endless societal and cultural issues? Well, I do not know because my favorite book this year is The Namesake. The Namesake unfortunately got a little bit of a bad reputation among our classes but after a little reflection I realized how much I actually enjoyed the book. First of all, the book is set in the fairly modern era so as a teenager currently, I can relate to some of the issues in the world that occur during the life of Gogol. Also, it was fun to see Gogol get accepted to Yale and then live the life that so many of us young people want to live in downtown New York City (at least for some of our younger years). The number of immigrants to the United States increases every year so I appreciated the perspective from one of these families. I now have a greater understanding for the difficulties and challenges they must face as they adapt to a new lifestyle as a family in a completely foreign country. I cannot fathom what it would be like to flatly have to tell someone, ‘“We have no relatives in this country”’ (79). I look forward to spending time with my family and I cannot imagine the feeling of loneliness and emptiness I would experience if an entire ocean separated us. Also, I never really thought much about the inevitable rift between parents and children as a result of the willingness of certain family members to assimilate into society at different speeds. I really enjoyed following the plot even though it was a little sad at times, especially when Gogol would realize, “He cannot remember the last time he and his father had spoken” (177). Jhumpa Lahiri includes several complex symbols and themes throughout the book and although it seems boring, I actually secretly kind of like to follow these hidden meanings and see how they progress throughout a book. Of course I could not forget the drama that Lahiri writes about when Gogol’s wife Moushumi cheats on him. I think we all took pleasure in ripping Moushumi to pieces as “she wonders if she is the only woman in her family ever to have betrayed her husband, to have been unfaithful” (266). We all criticized the characters in The Namesake extensively and this was very humorous and entertaining. It is not nearly as fun to talk about how much we like characters like in The Importance of Being Earnest because people do not express such strong emotions. However, when we hate characters, the discussions are so much more spirited and lively and because we grew very frustrated with almost everyone in the book, every class was interesting and animated. And honestly, maybe the reason that I liked The Namesake the most was because it was the start of the "Dear Journal" comments by Ms. Serensky. If I am not mistaken, I believe the "Dear Journal" series started with something like this, “Dear Journal, I will never be good enough. All I do is work for this woman and all she does is criticize me.” I may not necessarily have written this in my journal but I would tend to agree with what the quote is saying. Well, all in all, The Namesake was a well-written book with a plot that I actually enjoyed, complex characters we could all ridicule, and a host of symbols and metaphors.
![]() |







